Congress lets ski resorts keep federal permit fees—reducing oversight
H.R. 1084 — Ski Hill Resources for Economic Development Act · Filed by Joe Neguse (D-CO) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 6, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a special federal account to let ski area operators keep a portion of the permit fees they pay to the U.S. Forest Service, rather than those fees flowing to the general Treasury. Ski areas would retain 80% of their permit fees locally (75% for maintenance/operations, 25% for other improvements), with 20% distributed across the broader National Forest System. The retained fees would be available to the Forest Service for spending without requiring a separate congressional appropriation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a revenue-sharing arrangement that allows ski area permit fees to be retained and spent locally rather than flowing to the general Treasury. It is fundamentally a fiscal/budgetary measure affecting how public land fees are allocated and spent.
What the text implies
- Reduces congressional appropriations power over ski area management by creating a permanent, self-renewing revenue stream that does not require annual budget approval.
- May create incentive for Forest Service to prioritize ski area maintenance over other forest management priorities, since ski area revenue stays local while other forest needs compete for general appropriations.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
ski area operators and concessionaires; local ski resort communities; National Forest System units with ski operations