QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Pentagon to fast-track Israeli defense tech into U.S. military systems

H.R. 10796 — United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Act · Filed by Don Bacon (R-NE) · Introduced Oct 13, 2026 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Defense Technology Partnership Framework

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Secretary of Defense to designate a single executive agent to coordinate U.S.-Israel defense technology cooperation across research, development, procurement, and manufacturing. The agent will identify Israeli technologies for U.S. military use, facilitate joint ventures and co-production partnerships, and coordinate across DoD components and other federal agencies. Benefits flow to both governments' defense capabilities and to defense contractors and Israeli industry participating in joint ventures and co-production.

Why we flagged it

The bill establishes a coordination mechanism for bilateral defense technology cooperation, not a direct appropriation or regulatory change. Its primary function is institutional—designating an executive agent and defining cooperative domains—rather than allocating funds or imposing restrictions.

What the text implies

  • Accelerated technology integration pathways may bypass standard acquisition timelines and oversight, potentially reducing scrutiny of Israeli-origin systems entering U.S. military programs.
  • Joint ventures and co-production partnerships create financial incentives for defense contractors to prioritize Israeli technology adoption, which may not always align with U.S. procurement standards or competition.
  • The bill requires 'protection of sensitive technology and information' but does not define enforcement mechanisms, audit rights, or consequences for technology leakage in joint ventures.
  • Public transparency requirement (subsection g) explicitly excludes classified information and export-control details, meaning the public cannot assess what technologies are being shared or their strategic implications.
  • Coordination with State and Commerce Departments is discretionary ('as appropriate'), creating potential gaps in export-control enforcement and foreign-policy alignment.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill creates institutional coordination for defense technology sharing that may strengthen U.S. military capabilities and interoperability with a key ally, a potential public benefit. However, the mechanism is primarily a corporate and defense-industrial benefit—facilitating joint ventures, co-production partnerships, and technology transfer to private contractors—with limited transparency into what technologies are shared, how export controls are managed, or what operational security risks

Who stands to gain

  • U.S. defense contractors (joint venture and co-production partners)
  • Israeli defense industry (technology licensing, co-production, and procurement access)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and other DoD research entities (expanded research

Named in the bill

Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, Israel, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Missile Defense Agency, U.S. Space Command, Defense Innovation Unit, Irregular Warfare Technical Support Directorate, Secretary of State, Secretary of Commerce, Congressional Defense Committees

Where it stands

  • Oct 13, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 13, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs and House Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,717 characters) on Oct 16, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Pentagon to fast-track Israeli defense tech into U.S. military systems” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10796 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.