QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Pentagon opens books on military-local government deals

H.R. 10793 — To modify the authority of Department of Defense for installation support services and intergovernmental support agreements, and for other purposes. · Filed by Derek Schmidt (R-KS) · Introduced Oct 9, 2026 · Referred to committee

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Military Installation Transparency and…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands the Department of Defense's authority to use any DoD funding source to pay for intergovernmental support services (services provided by state, local, or tribal governments to military installations) and requires the Secretary of Defense to create a uniform framework, public database, and regular reporting system to track all such agreements. The bill benefits military installations by increasing flexibility in how they can fund local support services and benefits the public by mandating transparency through a searchable database and congressional reports on these agreements.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is twofold: (1) expanding DoD's authority to use any appropriated funds for intergovernmental support agreements, and (2) mandating comprehensive data collection, a public database, and congressional reporting on these agreements. The transparency and reporting requirements are the substantive innovation.

What the text implies

  • The definition of 'Department of Defense source' explicitly excludes permanent appropriations, revolving funds, and third-party financing, which may limit the scope of funding flexibility in practice and could create disputes over what counts as an eligible 'source.'
  • The public database and quadrennial reports will expose the full scope of DoD-local government financial relationships, potentially revealing cost-shifting or unequal burden-sharing between federal and local entities.
  • The framework's requirement to assess 'barriers to adoption' and identify 'underutilizing' installations may create pressure on military commanders to increase intergovernmental agreements, potentially shifting more installation support costs to local governments.
  • The bill requires analysis of 'financial and nonfinancial performance outcomes' but does not define success metrics, leaving the Secretary discretion to frame results and potentially obscure poor outcomes.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill increases transparency and accountability by mandating a public database and regular congressional reporting on DoD-local government agreements, allowing citizens and elected representatives to monitor how military installations interact with and fund local services. The expanded funding flexibility for DoD may improve installation support services without imposing new costs on citizens.

Who stands to gain

  • State and local governments (through expanded DoD funding for services)
  • Military installations (through increased funding flexibility)

Named in the bill

Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Army, Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, State and local governments, Tribal governments, Military installations, Congress

Where it stands

  • Oct 9, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 9, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,304 characters) on Oct 15, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Pentagon opens books on military-local government deals” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10793 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.