QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Streaming services banned from bait-and-switch: ad-free stays ad-free for a year

H.R. 10696 — Ad-Free Means Ad-Free Act · Filed by Josh Riley (D-NY) · Introduced Oct 1, 2026 · Referred to committee

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection Against Deceptive…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Federal Trade Commission to write rules prohibiting video streaming services from advertising ad-free subscriptions and then adding ads to those same subscriptions within one year of enrollment (or the contract length, whichever is longer). It applies even if the service is sold through a third party, and violations are treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices enforceable by the FTC.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward FTC rulemaking to prevent bait-and-switch advertising by streaming services. It is a consumer-protection measure, not a subsidy, tax carve-out, or industry giveaway.

What the text implies

  • The one-year protection window may incentivize providers to introduce ads just after the protected period expires, shifting the harm rather than eliminating it.
  • The rule applies to re-enrollment; a subscriber who cancels and re-enrolls gets another one-year window, potentially creating a loophole if providers offer incentives to cancel and re-enroll at a lower tier.
  • The definition of 'video streaming service' is broad and includes third-party distribution, which may create compliance complexity for platforms that resell subscriptions.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Consumers who purchase ad-free subscriptions are protected from deceptive switching to ad-supported tiers within a guaranteed period, eliminating a bait-and-switch practice that harms subscriber trust and value. The bill imposes a compliance cost on streaming providers but no direct cost to citizens.

Named in the bill

Federal Trade Commission (FTC), video streaming service providers, Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Max, Paramount+, Apple TV+

Where it stands

  • Oct 1, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 1, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,435 characters) on Oct 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Streaming services banned from bait-and-switch: ad-free stays ad-free for a year” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10696 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.