Federal grant program would reimburse states for immigration enforcement costs
H.R. 10503 — To establish a Federal grant program to reimburse certain States for the costs incurred and damage caused by widespread deployment of Federal immigration officials, and for other purposes. · Filed by Ilhan Omar (D-MN) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 17, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill would create a federal grant program to reimburse states for costs and damages they claim resulted from federal immigration enforcement operations. Without the full text, the scope of reimbursable costs, eligibility criteria, and funding amount cannot be determined.
Why we flagged it
The bill's stated mechanism is a federal reimbursement program for state costs attributed to federal immigration enforcement. This is a fiscal federalism instrument, not a substantive immigration or enforcement policy change.
What the text implies
- Reimbursement structure may incentivize states to increase immigration enforcement activity or to attribute broader costs to federal enforcement, creating a moral hazard.
- Definition of 'damage caused by' federal immigration officials is undefined; could encompass property damage, legal liability, detention facility costs, or collateral economic harm depending on legislative intent.
- Grant program may create federal-state disputes over cost allocation and causation, requiring administrative adjudication of reimbursement claims.
- Phrase 'for other purposes' in title suggests additional provisions not disclosed in metadata; full text required to assess scope.
Who it affects
The bill's civic effect depends entirely on what costs are deemed reimbursable and whether the grants represent genuine public expense or a subsidy for state enforcement choices. Without the text, the balance between federal accountability for enforcement costs and potential incentivization of aggressive state immigration enforcement cannot be assessed.
Who stands to gain
- state governments (primary recipients of federal grants)
Named in the bill
U.S. House of Representatives, House Committee on Ways and Means, Federal government, State governments
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Democrats.
- Sep 17, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 17, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Homeland Security · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Ways…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Sep 21, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,522 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-21.
“Federal grant program would reimburse states for immigration enforcement costs” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10503 Report an error