Congress orders health study on power lines—but won't fund or act on it
H.R. 10491 — CHARGE Act · Filed by Warren Davidson (R-OH) · Introduced Sep 17, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the National Institutes of Health to study whether high-voltage transmission lines (750 kilovolts or greater) affect human health, livestock health, and crop yields, and to report findings to four congressional committees. It creates no new restrictions, funding mechanism, or regulatory authority—only a research mandate.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a directive to NIH to conduct and report on a specific scientific study. It is a research authorization, not a regulatory, appropriations, or commemorative measure.
What the text implies
- Study scope is limited to 750-kV+ lines; lower-voltage distribution infrastructure (which affects far more people) is excluded, potentially leaving the most common exposure unexamined.
- No funding amount is specified in the bill; study may not proceed without separate appropriation, creating implementation uncertainty.
- Report goes only to four congressional committees; no requirement for public release, peer review, or regulatory agency action, limiting downstream impact.
- Study timeline is open-ended ('as soon as practically feasible'), with no deadline, potentially delaying findings indefinitely.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The study itself is a public good—independent research on potential health and agricultural risks from infrastructure serves transparency and informed policymaking. However, the bill creates no enforcement mechanism, funding authorization, or remedial pathway; it is purely informational. Citizens gain knowledge but no direct protection or remedy.
Who stands to gain
- National Institutes of Health (research funding recipient, if appropriated)
- Research institutions and contractors hired to conduct the study
Named in the bill
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Secretary of Health and Human Services, House Committee on Agriculture, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Where it stands
- Sep 17, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 17, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,138 characters) on Sep 24, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,819 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-25.
“Congress orders health study on power lines—but won't fund or act on it” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10491 Report an error