Federal ban on cannabis insurance lifted—but federal crime status unchanged
H.R. 10471 — CLAIM Act · Filed by Nydia Velázquez (D-NY) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prevents federal agencies from punishing insurance companies that sell insurance to state-legal cannabis businesses, and shields those insurers and their employees from federal liability for doing so. It also requires a study on barriers facing minority and women-owned cannabis businesses in accessing financial services.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to remove federal barriers preventing insurers from serving a state-legal industry. It is a deregulatory measure narrowly tailored to one sector and one federal restraint mechanism.
- Section 3 mandates a GAO study on barriers to entry and financial services access for minority and women-owned cannabis businesses—substantively unrelated to the insurance safe harbor.
What the text implies
- Federal agencies may interpret 'adverse or corrective supervisory action' narrowly, potentially limiting their ability to examine insurers' cannabis-related underwriting practices for fraud, money laundering, or other federal crimes.
- The liability shield in section (c) may create a safe harbor for insurers to ignore federal anti-money-laundering obligations when processing cannabis business payments, if those obligations are framed as 'solely for engaging in the business of insurance.'
- State-legal cannabis businesses remain federally illegal under the Controlled Substances Act; this bill does not change that status, only shields insurers from federal retaliation for serving them—creating a legal asymmetry where the underlying activity remains criminal but its insurance is protected.
- The bill's definition of 'financial service' is extremely broad and includes money transmission and armored car services, potentially extending the safe harbor beyond insurance to other financial intermediaries serving cannabis businesses.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens in states where cannabis is legal can now obtain insurance for their businesses and property, closing a gap created by federal pressure on insurers. The safe harbor removes a federal barrier to a lawful state-regulated market without creating new public harms.
Who stands to gain
- insurance companies and insurers
- cannabis manufacturers and producers
- cannabis retailers and dispensaries
- cannabis-related service providers
Named in the bill
Federal agencies, Insurers, Cannabis-related legitimate businesses, State governments, Indian Tribes, Minority-owned and women-owned cannabis businesses, Comptroller General of the United States, Controlled Substances Act, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, McCarran-Ferguson Act
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Sep 16, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 16, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,592 characters) on Sep 24, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,819 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-25.
“Federal ban on cannabis insurance lifted—but federal crime status unchanged” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10471 Report an error