QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal AI systems must now be discoverable, inventoried, and controlled.

H.R. 10362 — Stop Rogue AI Act · Filed by Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 14, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
AI Security and Governance Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop security standards for AI agents—autonomous software systems that make decisions and interact with other systems with minimal human oversight. Federal agencies and contractors must adopt these standards, maintain inventories of all AI agents they deploy, verify their identity cryptographically, monitor their actions continuously, and log everything in tamper-proof records. The bill applies to new contracts only and aims to prevent rogue AI from operating undetected or uncontrolled within government systems.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to establish mandatory security standards and discovery/control requirements for AI agents in federal systems. It is a governance and cybersecurity measure, not a deregulation, subsidy, or commemorative act.

What the text implies

  • The requirement for 'cryptographically verifiable provenance' and 'tamper-evident logs' creates a permanent audit trail of AI agent actions, potentially enabling forensic investigation of AI-driven decisions in government—a transparency mechanism that could expose algorithmic bias or errors in federal decision-making.
  • The mandate that agencies maintain 'organizational control' independent of contractors means federal agencies cannot outsource oversight of AI systems to the vendors who built them, shifting power back to government and away from private AI vendors.
  • The 'defense-in-depth' and continuous monitoring requirements may impose significant compliance costs on contractors, potentially raising the cost of federal AI procurement and favoring larger vendors with compliance infrastructure.
  • The bill's requirement for 'open, vendor-agnostic, and interoperable standards' may constrain proprietary AI discovery mechanisms and force vendors to adopt standardized identity and registry frameworks, reducing lock-in but also limiting competitive differentiation.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill strengthens government's ability to detect and control AI systems operating within federal infrastructure, reducing the risk of unmonitored autonomous systems making decisions or accessing data without human oversight. Citizens benefit from increased transparency and control over AI systems that may affect government services, security, and data handling.

Who stands to gain

  • cybersecurity consulting firms (compliance and implementation support)
  • enterprise software vendors (identity verification, logging, monitoring tools)
  • federal contractors with existing compliance infrastructure

Named in the bill

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.

  • Sep 14, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Sep 14, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (12,546 characters) on Sep 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,342 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-09-18.

“Federal AI systems must now be discoverable, inventoried, and controlled.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10362 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record