QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal grants expand data literacy education for underrepresented STEM students

H.R. 10347 — Data Science and Literacy Act of 2026 · Filed by Haley Stevens (D-MI) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 10, 2026 · Referred to committee

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Educational Access and Workforce Development

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program awarding up to $10 million per year (2027–2031) to schools, school districts, colleges, and tribal schools to expand data literacy and data science education. Grantees must use funds for at least two of eight activities: developing curricula, expanding student access to courses, recruiting data science teachers, providing professional development, or partnering with industry. The bill also requires the Department of Education to collect and report statistics on STEM teachers in secondary schools every five years.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a competitive grant program funding data literacy education in K–12 and higher education, with explicit equity focus on underrepresented students and community colleges. It is a straightforward public investment in STEM workforce development and civic literacy.

What the text implies

  • The bill's emphasis on 'data literacy' as a civic skill (understanding data-driven claims in news, advertising, social media) may indirectly strengthen citizens' ability to evaluate misinformation and algorithmic manipulation, though this is not explicitly stated.
  • Mandatory disaggregation of student data by race, ethnicity, gender, and lunch eligibility creates a longitudinal dataset on STEM access disparities, which could inform future equity-focused policy but also centralizes demographic tracking in federal education databases.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

public school districts and state education agencies (grant recipients); institutions of higher education (grant recipients); tribal schools and Bureau of Indian Education schools (grant recipients)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record