Terrorism victims gain clearer path to collect court judgments
H.R. 10339 — Terrorism Judgment Collection Act · Filed by Thomas Kean (R-NJ) · Introduced Sep 10, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 to clarify when an entity's status as an agency or instrumentality of a terrorist party is determined for purposes of collecting judgments. Instead of determining status at some other point in time, the bill specifies that status is assessed on the date a judgment holder begins legal action to enforce or attach assets to satisfy the judgment.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole function is to clarify the timing of status determination for terrorist-party entities under the TRIA, making judgment collection more straightforward. It is a technical amendment to existing terrorism-liability law, not a substantive policy shift.
What the text implies
- By fixing status determination at the moment of enforcement action, the bill may prevent defendants from arguing that their terrorist-party status changed between judgment and collection, closing a potential loophole.
- The rule may accelerate collection timelines by eliminating disputes over when status should be assessed, reducing litigation costs for judgment holders.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Terrorism victims and judgment holders gain clarity and enforceability: the bill removes timing ambiguity that could have been exploited to block collection. A clear rule favoring judgment holders over terrorist-linked entities serves the public interest in compensating victims and enforcing judgments against terrorism-related defendants.