QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Terrorism victims gain clearer path to collect court judgments

H.R. 10339 — Terrorism Judgment Collection Act · Filed by Thomas Kean (R-NJ) · Introduced Sep 10, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Terrorism Judgment Enforcement Clarification

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 to clarify when an entity's status as an agency or instrumentality of a terrorist party is determined for purposes of collecting judgments. Instead of determining status at some other point in time, the bill specifies that status is assessed on the date a judgment holder begins legal action to enforce or attach assets to satisfy the judgment.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole function is to clarify the timing of status determination for terrorist-party entities under the TRIA, making judgment collection more straightforward. It is a technical amendment to existing terrorism-liability law, not a substantive policy shift.

What the text implies

  • By fixing status determination at the moment of enforcement action, the bill may prevent defendants from arguing that their terrorist-party status changed between judgment and collection, closing a potential loophole.
  • The rule may accelerate collection timelines by eliminating disputes over when status should be assessed, reducing litigation costs for judgment holders.
  • Clarity on timing may increase the practical value of TRIA judgments, potentially affecting settlement negotiations in terrorism-related civil cases.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Terrorism victims and judgment holders gain clarity and enforceability: the bill removes timing ambiguity that could have been exploited to block collection. A clear rule favoring judgment holders over terrorist-linked entities serves the public interest in compensating victims and enforcing judgments against terrorism-related defendants.

Named in the bill

Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, 15 U.S.C. § 6701(a), judgment holders, terrorist parties

Where it stands

  • Sep 10, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Sep 10, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (632 characters) on Sep 16, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,606 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-31.

“Terrorism victims gain clearer path to collect court judgments” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10339 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.