Repealing Section 230 would hand platforms power to silence users
H.R. 10332 — Sunset Section 230 Act · Filed by Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 10, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill repeals Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, a provision that shields online platforms and websites from liability for user-generated content and gives them broad discretion to moderate content. The repeal takes effect two years after enactment. The bill also removes cross-references to Section 230 throughout federal law and updates definitions in related statutes to reference Section 223 instead.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is the repeal of Section 230, which fundamentally restructures liability for online platforms. This is a deregulation-in-reverse: it removes a liability shield and exposes platforms to lawsuits. The conforming amendments are technical housekeeping to remove orphaned cross-references.
What the text implies
- Repeal creates massive litigation exposure for platforms, likely forcing them to adopt aggressive automated content removal and user-blocking to minimize legal risk—potentially silencing legitimate speech.
- Small platforms and startups lack resources to defend against liability and will likely exit the market or shut down user-generated content entirely, consolidating power in large, well-capitalized platforms.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
litigation-heavy industries (law firms, class-action attorneys); large incumbent platforms with resources to defend lawsuits; content moderation service providers