Federal agencies must now inventory and audit seized cryptocurrency
H.R. 10317 — Inventory Act of 2026 · Filed by Darrell Issa (R-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 8, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires federal agencies to scan, inventory, and audit any cryptocurrency or digital assets they seize or hold in custody. Agencies must develop secure storage protocols, conduct annual audits, and report findings to Congress. The bill funds digital forensic tools through existing asset forfeiture accounts. Citizens benefit through better government accountability for seized assets; law enforcement gains clearer procedures and tools for managing digital evidence.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is establishing mandatory inventory, security, and audit procedures for digital assets in federal custody. It is a governance and oversight mechanism, not a deregulation, subsidy, or private carve-out. The funding mechanism (asset forfeiture accounts) is incidental to the accountability mandate.
What the text implies
- The bill references 'Genius Act' for the definition of 'digital asset' but does not quote or define it inline—analysis depends on that external statute, which is not provided here. If the Genius Act definition is narrow or excludes certain asset types, the inventory scope may be narrower than the bill's language suggests.
- The bill authorizes 'discovery and scanning tools' to locate 'recoverable digital assets' but does not explicitly restrict use of these tools to seized property only—language could be read to permit proactive scanning of agency systems, though the operative sections tie scanning to seizure/forfeiture events.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
digital forensic software vendors; cybersecurity and blockchain analysis firms