Parents get veto power over kids' social media data—platforms must ask first
H.R. 10207 — GUARDIAN Act · Filed by Erin Houchin (R-IN) · Introduced Sep 1, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
The GUARDIAN Act requires social media platforms to obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting or using personal data from children under 16. Platforms must delete minors' data when they turn 16 unless parents request retention, provide parents with download access to their child's data, and allow parents to withdraw consent at any time. The FTC enforces the rule as an unfair or deceptive practice, with state attorneys general also empowered to sue on behalf of residents.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a parental-consent requirement for data processing on minors under 16, modeled on COPPA but extended to all 'covered platforms' (social media, engagement-driven sites). It is a privacy protection statute, not a deregulation or carve-out.
What the text implies
- Age-verification requirement may incentivize platforms to collect identity documents or biometric data from parents/minors to prove age, potentially creating new privacy risks during the verification process itself.
- 18-month implementation window may allow platforms to lobby for narrower definitions of 'covered platform' or 'design feature' before final rules; the bill's structural definitions are detailed but regulatory interpretation will matter.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens—particularly parents and children—gain enforceable privacy rights, data control, and transparency over how social media platforms collect and use minors' personal information. Platforms face compliance costs but no citizens lose existing rights; the bill restores parental authority over children's digital footprint.