Congress bans Chinese seafood from its own cafeterias—but not from your grocery store
H.R. 10176 — No PRC Seafood in Congress Act · Filed by Chris Smith (R-NJ) · Introduced Aug 27, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the purchase, serving, or sale of seafood products from China (including Hong Kong and Macau) in congressional dining facilities. It requires suppliers to certify the country of origin for every seafood product and maintain records to prove it, citing concerns about forced labor in Chinese fishing and seafood processing. The bill applies to all cafeterias and restaurants in the Capitol building and grounds.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a labor-rights measure (forced labor in seafood) but applies it only to Congress itself, not to the broader public. It is a transparency and supply-chain accountability measure, but narrowly scoped to a single institution's dining facilities rather than a systemic reform.
What the text implies
- The bill does not extend forced-labor protections to seafood sold to the general public, creating a double standard: Congress protects itself from forced-labor seafood while citizens remain exposed to the same supply-chain risks in retail markets.
- The country-of-origin certification requirement may increase compliance costs for suppliers, potentially raising menu prices in congressional dining facilities, but the cost is borne by the institution, not suppliers directly.
- The bill's definition of 'Chinese seafood product' includes vessels owned or operated by Chinese nationals or entities, which may capture some seafood caught in international waters—a broader scope than geography alone.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill addresses a legitimate labor-rights concern (forced labor in Chinese seafood supply chains) and applies a transparency requirement (country-of-origin certification) that could improve supply-chain accountability. However, the practical impact on ordinary citizens is minimal—the restriction applies only to congressional dining facilities, affecting a tiny fraction of the population (Capitol workers and visitors). The bill does not address forced labor in seafood sold to the general publi
Named in the bill
People's Republic of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Committee on House Administration, Committee on Rules and Administration, Architect of the Capitol, Capitol Buildings, United States Capitol Grounds
Where it stands
- Aug 27, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Aug 27, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on House Administration · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on House Administration”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,061 characters) on Sep 5, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-21.
“Congress bans Chinese seafood from its own cafeterias—but not from your grocery store” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10176 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.