QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Retirement plan deregulation: charities get relief, investors lose disclosures

H.R. 1013 — Retirement Fairness for Charities and Educational Institutions Act of 2025 · Filed by Frank Lucas (R-OK) · 24 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Reported out

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
45/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernRegulatory Exemption for Retirement Plans

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends federal securities laws to exempt 403(b) retirement plans (used by charities and educational institutions) from certain investment company registration and disclosure requirements, provided employers act as fiduciaries and review investment options before offering them to participants. The practical effect is to reduce regulatory burden on 403(b) plan administrators and the financial firms that service them, while maintaining a fiduciary approval gate.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a carve-out from securities registration and disclosure requirements for 403(b) plans. While framed as 'fairness' and 'enhancement,' the core function is deregulation—removing compliance obligations that would otherwise apply to investment offerings.

What the text implies

  • Participants lose access to standardized securities disclosures (prospectuses, risk summaries) that would normally accompany investment options, relying instead on employer review as the sole gate.
  • Insurance companies and financial service providers (the mapped stocks: AIG, PRU, etc.) face reduced compliance costs and regulatory friction when servicing 403(b) plans, lowering their operational burden.
  • The fiduciary approval requirement is employer-side only; there is no independent third-party audit or participant remedy if an employer approves a problematic investment.
  • Smaller charities and educational institutions may lack the expertise to meaningfully review complex investment products, creating a gap between the nominal fiduciary gate and actual investor protection.
  • The exemption applies uniformly regardless of plan size or participant sophistication, potentially exposing less-informed participants to investment risks without standard disclosure safeguards.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Participants in 403(b) plans may benefit from reduced administrative costs and faster investment option deployment if employers pass savings along. However, the exemption from securities registration and disclosure rules reduces transparency and investor protections that would normally apply to investment offerings, creating a trade-off between cost efficiency and regulatory oversight.

Who stands to gain

  • insurance companies (AIG, PRU, FBK, PFG, FMAO)
  • financial service providers and plan administrators
  • investment product manufacturers

Named in the bill

403(b) plans, charities, educational institutions, Investment Company Act of 1940, Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Internal Revenue Code Section 403, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), AIG, Prudential (PRU), Fidelity & Guaranty Life (FBK), Principal Financial Group (PFG) — and 1 more

Where it stands

24 cosponsors: 19 Democrats, 5 Republicans.

  • Feb 5, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Feb 5, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
  • May 20, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
  • May 20, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 8”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

44 lobbying clients named this bill on 85 disclosure filings across 6 quarters, Mar 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $81,701,337 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 99% of bills with at least one filing.

Frank Lucas, the sponsor, reported $719,880 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $4,500 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.

  • Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
  • American Bankers Association — $5,210,000 on 2 filings
  • Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association — $5,090,000 on 2 filings
  • American Council of Life Insurers — $4,085,837 on 3 filings
  • American Association for Justice — $3,610,000 on 2 filings

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,608 characters) on Jul 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Retirement plan deregulation: charities get relief, investors lose disclosures” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1013 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.