DOE must prioritize removing nuclear waste from risky locations
H.R. 1012 — Spent Fuel Prioritization Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Levin (D-CA) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Nuclear Waste Policy Act to require the Department of Energy to prioritize accepting spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste from civilian nuclear power plants based on four criteria: whether the reactor is decommissioned or decommissioning, the population density of the area, earthquake hazard risk, and national security concerns. Plants meeting these criteria—especially decommissioned reactors in high-population, high-seismic-risk, or security-sensitive areas—move to the front of the acceptance queue.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a reordering of DOE acceptance priorities to favor high-risk locations and decommissioned reactors. It is a straightforward safety and security measure, not a deregulation, subsidy, or carve-out.
What the text implies
- Decommissioned reactors may see faster fuel removal, potentially accelerating site remediation and reducing long-term stewardship costs for utilities and communities.
- The bill does not create new DOE capacity or funding; it reorders the queue. Acceleration for high-priority sites may delay acceptance at lower-priority reactors, shifting risk geographically rather than eliminating it.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens in densely populated areas, high-seismic-risk zones, and national-security-sensitive locations gain faster removal of spent fuel from their communities, reducing long-term storage risk and accident exposure. The bill prioritizes public safety and security over a first-come, first-served model that could leave dangerous materials in vulnerable locations indefinitely.