QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal civil-rights enforcement gets a clearer antisemitism standard

H.R. 1007 — Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2025 · Filed by Michael Lawler (R-NY) · 89 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Referred to committee

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Civil Rights Enforcement Clarification

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism when investigating discrimination complaints under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (which covers race, color, and national origin). It treats antisemitism rooted in perceived Jewish ancestry or ethnic characteristics as a form of national-origin discrimination, allowing federal enforcement against campus and school antisemitism. The bill does not expand the Education Department's authority or alter existing discrimination standards—it specifies which definition to consult when assessing whether conduct was motivated by antisemitic intent.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward directive to a federal agency on how to interpret and apply an existing civil-rights statute. It does not create new law, new rights, or new restrictions—it specifies which definition of antisemitism the Education Department should use when investigating discrimination complaints already within its jurisdiction.

What the text implies

  • The IHRA definition includes examples of antisemitism that reference Israel and Israeli policy; adoption of this definition may affect how universities and schools investigate complaints involving criticism of Israel, potentially chilling speech on that topic or conversely clarifying what conduct crosses into discrimination.
  • By anchoring antisemitism to perceived Jewish ancestry/ethnicity rather than religion alone, the bill may broaden Title VI's reach into forms of discrimination that were previously harder to classify, potentially increasing the number of complaints investigated and resolved under federal civil-rights law.
  • The bill's reliance on a definition adopted by an international body (IHRA) rather than one drafted by Congress itself delegates interpretive authority to an external standard, which could shift over time if IHRA updates its definition.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Jewish students and communities gain a clearer, federally recognized standard for identifying and challenging antisemitic discrimination in schools and colleges. The bill does not restrict anyone's speech or rights—it provides a definition to guide enforcement of existing civil-rights law against discrimination already prohibited. Non-Jewish citizens are unaffected; the bill narrows no protections and expands none beyond what Title VI already covers.

Named in the bill

Department of Education, International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), Department of State, White House, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 13899

Where it stands

89 cosponsors: 62 Republicans, 26 Democrats, 1 Independents.

  • Feb 5, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Feb 5, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

7 lobbying clients named this bill on 11 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,569,705 in lobbying spend. A filing names 36 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 86% of bills with at least one filing.

Michael Lawler, the sponsor, reported $2,042,071 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Anti-defamation League — $590,000 on 2 filings
  • J Street — $340,000 on 2 filings
  • Christians United for Israel Action Fund — $269,705 on 2 filings
  • Hadassah, the Women's Zionist Organization of America, Inc. — $120,000 on 2 filings
  • Republican Jewish Coalition — $100,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,397 characters) on Sep 23, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,707 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-23.

“Federal civil-rights enforcement gets a clearer antisemitism standard” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr1007 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record