QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds forest restoration to protect communities from beetle-driven wildfires

H.R. 10000 — Emergency Mountain Pine Beetle Response Act · Filed by Brittany Pettersen (D-CO) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 30, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Forest Health and Wildfire Risk Reduction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to create a competitive grant program that awards federal money to states, local governments, tribes, water districts, and utilities to remove beetle-killed trees, thin forests, reduce wildfire fuel, restore watersheds, and replant forests on National Forest lands affected by mountain pine beetle outbreaks. Grants prioritize projects that protect water supplies, reduce wildfire risk to communities, address severe beetle mortality, and align with state forest plans.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a competitive grant program for emergency forest restoration and beetle response on federal lands. The stated purpose and actual mechanism align: grants fund tree removal, thinning, reforestation, and watershed protection—all direct responses to mountain pine beetle damage and wildfire risk.

What the text implies

  • Grants to water districts and utilities may indirectly subsidize private water/power customers if those entities pass cost savings downstream, though the bill does not explicitly require or prohibit this.
  • The 30-day disbursement window creates tight administrative timelines that may favor larger, better-resourced applicants (states, large utilities) over smaller local governments or tribes with limited grant-writing capacity.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

state and local governments; Indian tribes; water management and conservation districts

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record