Congress signals support for abortion restrictions in non-binding 'Life Month' resolution
H.J.Res. 98 — Life Month Resolution · Filed by Chris Smith (R-NJ) · 24 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a non-binding resolution expressing support for designating June as 'Life Month' and urging Congress to recognize the sanctity of human life, protect the unborn, and support women and families. It contains no operative legislation, appropriations, or enforceable requirements—it is a statement of values and policy direction.
Why we flagged it
This is a concurrent or simple resolution expressing congressional sentiment on abortion and family policy. It contains no operative clause, no appropriation, no regulatory change, and no enforcement mechanism. It is purely a statement of values and policy direction.
What the text implies
- The resolution's framing of life as 'a sacred gift from God' and invocation of the Declaration of Independence may signal support for constitutional or statutory abortion restrictions, though it does not mandate them.
- The call to 'defend the sanctity of human life by enacting laws that protect the unborn' is a direct urge to restrict abortion access, but the resolution itself does not restrict anything.
- The vague language about 'resources to empower women and families to choose life' does not specify what resources or policies are intended, leaving implementation to future legislation.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The resolution itself changes no law and imposes no direct cost or benefit. However, it signals congressional support for abortion restrictions and expanded family support—a mix of positions that divide the public. Citizens who oppose abortion restrictions see this as a threat to reproductive autonomy; those who support fetal protection see it as affirming their values. The family-support language is broadly popular but vague and non-binding.
Named in the bill
House of Representatives, Senate, faith-based organizations
Where it stands
24 cosponsors: 24 Republicans.
- Jun 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (705 characters) on Nov 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,927 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-11-02.
“Congress signals support for abortion restrictions in non-binding 'Life Month' resolution” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hjres98 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.