Amendment would bar naturalized citizens from federal judgeships
H.J.Res. 204 — Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that certain individuals are natural born citizens. · Filed by Clay Fuller (R-GA) · Introduced Jul 21, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring all federal judges—including Supreme Court justices—to be natural-born citizens. Currently, the Constitution requires only the President to be a natural-born citizen; judges face no such restriction. If ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures within seven years, this amendment would bar naturalized citizens from serving on any federal court.
Why we flagged it
This is a straightforward constitutional amendment proposal with no hidden mechanisms or riders. It states plainly what it does: propose a new eligibility requirement for federal judges. The mechanism is transparent and the scope is narrow.
What the text implies
- Naturalized citizens—including military veterans, immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for decades, and individuals who passed rigorous citizenship exams—would be permanently barred from federal judicial service, regardless of qualifications or experience.
- The amendment's six-month implementation window after ratification creates a transition period during which sitting naturalized-citizen judges would remain in office, but no new naturalized citizens could be appointed.
- State legislatures (not voters directly) control ratification, meaning the amendment's fate depends on state-level political composition rather than direct popular vote, potentially amplifying partisan or regional preferences.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The amendment restricts access to federal judicial office based on citizenship status, excluding naturalized citizens from a position of power and potentially narrowing the bench's diversity of background and perspective. However, citizens retain the right to elect representatives who ratify or reject the amendment through their state legislatures, preserving democratic process. The civic cost (exclusion of a class of citizens) and the democratic mechanism (constitutional amendment requiring sup
Named in the bill
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Mr. Fuller, Supreme Court, Federal Courts, State Legislatures
Where it stands
- Jul 21, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 21, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,250 characters) on Jul 22, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Amendment would bar naturalized citizens from federal judgeships” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hjres204 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.