Congress proposes banning dual citizens from federal office
H.J.Res. 194 — Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit any person who has citizenship or nationality of, or otherwise owes allegiance to, a country other than the United States from serving as a Representative or Senator in Congress, a Judge of the Supreme Court or any inferior court, an Ambassador, public Minister or Consul, or any other officer of the United States which requires the advice and consent of the Senate, or the President or Vice President unless the person formally and permanently relinquishes such citizenship, nationality, or allegiance. · Filed by Nancy Mace (R-SC) · Introduced Jun 3, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This proposed constitutional amendment would ban anyone with citizenship, nationality, or allegiance to any country other than the United States from serving in Congress, the federal judiciary, the presidency, vice presidency, or Senate-confirmed positions (ambassadors, cabinet officers, etc.) unless they formally and permanently renounce all foreign ties. The amendment would take effect at different times for different offices, ranging from six months to the next odd-numbered year after ratification.
Why we flagged it
This is a straightforward constitutional amendment proposal that plainly states its mechanism: barring dual nationals and foreign nationals from high federal office. It is not hidden or deceptive in its intent, though its scope and vague language raise serious civic concerns.
What the text implies
- The phrase 'owes allegiance' is undefined and could be interpreted to challenge naturalized citizens based on family ties, cultural identity, or political speech rather than actual foreign loyalty or legal obligation.
- Retroactive application to sitting senators (allowing them to finish current terms but barring re-election) creates a two-tier citizenship system and may incentivize forced renunciation under political pressure.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The amendment addresses a legitimate civic concern—ensuring undivided loyalty in high federal office—but its scope is extraordinarily broad and may exclude qualified naturalized citizens and dual nationals who pose no actual security or loyalty risk. The vague language 'owes allegiance' could be weaponized to challenge citizens based on ancestry, family ties, or political affiliation rather than genuine foreign loyalty.