QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to restore overdraft protections banks tried to shed

H.J.Res. 169 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-05: Improper Overdraft Opt-In Practices". · Filed by Nydia Velázquez (D-NY) · Introduced Apr 30, 2026 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection Restoration

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution blocks the CFPB's attempt to withdraw a consumer protection rule (Circular 2024-05) that restricts improper overdraft opt-in practices. By disapproving the CFPB's withdrawal, Congress restores the overdraft protection rule, preventing banks from using aggressive tactics to enroll consumers in overdraft fees.

Why we flagged it

This is a Congressional Review Act (CRA) disapproval resolution that uses the CRA's one-sentence procedural mechanism to block a regulatory withdrawal. The operative effect is restoration of a consumer protection rule, not deregulation.

What the text implies

  • If enacted, this resolution would set a precedent for using CRA disapprovals to block agency rescissions of rules—a reversal of the typical CRA use (blocking new rules). This could constrain future administrations' ability to roll back regulations.
  • The resolution targets a specific CFPB circular by name and Federal Register citation, making it a narrow legislative intervention in a discrete regulatory action rather than a broad policy statement.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Ordinary consumers regain protection against predatory overdraft enrollment practices. Banks lose a regulatory rollback they had secured, but consumers gain restored safeguards against fees triggered by aggressive opt-in schemes.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record