Congress proposes locking voting rules in Constitution, blocking future reforms
H.J.Res. 152 — Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to ensure that only citizens are eligible to vote in Federal elections. · Filed by Laurel Lee (R-FL) · 10 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 19, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment stating that only U.S. citizens may vote in federal elections (President, Vice President, Senate, House, and electors). It gives states the power to set voting rules, with Congress able to override or set rules for Washington, D.C. The amendment would need ratification by three-fourths of the states to take effect.
Why we flagged it
This is a straightforward joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment. It does not create new law or policy; it proposes to elevate an existing legal requirement (citizenship for federal voting) to constitutional status. The mechanism is purely procedural and transparent.
What the text implies
- Constitutionalizing citizenship voting requirement makes future voting-rights reforms (e.g., lowering voting age, expanding access) require constitutional amendment rather than legislation, raising the procedural bar significantly.
- Amendment language grants states broad power to set voting rules, with Congress able to override—this preserves federalism but may create patchwork enforcement and litigation over what constitutes 'appropriate legislation.'
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The amendment codifies an existing legal requirement (citizenship for federal voting), which protects the integrity of federal elections and is consistent with current law—a modest civic benefit. However, the amendment's true effect is procedural and political: it raises the bar for future voting-rights expansion by requiring constitutional amendment rather than legislation, potentially restricting democratic flexibility to address future voting-access questions.