Constitutional amendment would ban non-citizen voting nationwide
H.J.Res. 107 — Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit voting in Federal, State, or local elections by individuals who are not citizens of the United States. · Filed by Claudia Tenney (R-NY) · Introduced Jul 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment that would explicitly prohibit non-citizens from voting in any U.S. election—federal, state, or local—and on ballot initiatives or referendums. It grants Congress enforcement power. The amendment requires ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures within seven years to take effect.
Why we flagged it
This is a straightforward constitutional amendment proposal with no hidden mechanisms or riders. It states its single operative purpose plainly: to add an explicit constitutional prohibition on non-citizen voting. The mechanism is transparent and the scope is clear.
What the text implies
- Amendment would preempt state and local experimentation with non-citizen voting in municipal elections (e.g., school board, local referendum participation), which some jurisdictions have adopted to include long-term residents in decisions affecting them.
- Ratification would require three-fourths of state legislatures, a very high bar; failure to ratify leaves the status quo (federal prohibition + state-by-state variation) in place.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The amendment codifies an existing de facto rule (non-citizens cannot vote in federal elections; most states already prohibit state/local non-citizen voting) and closes potential state-level gaps, which protects electoral integrity. However, it also forecloses any future state experimentation with limited non-citizen voting in local elections (a practice some municipalities have adopted for school boards or municipal referenda), and it does so at the constitutional level—the highest bar to rever